Izmantotā literatūra

1) Aiken, George. 2002, Organic Matter in Ground Water., US Geological Survey, 1p

2) Ankley, Schubauer-Berigan, 1994, Comparison of techniques for the isolation of sediment pore water for toxicity testing, Earth and Enviromental Science, vol.27, 507-512

3) Blomqvist S., 1991, REVIEW, Quantitative sampling of soft-bottom sediments: problems and solutions, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., Vol. 72, 295-304

4) Cabaniss S S, Madey G., Leff L, Maurice P ,  Wetzel R,2007., Stochastic Synthesis of Natural Organic Matter,  Biogeochemistry ,Volume 86, Number 3 , 269-286,

5) Chapman P., Feiyue Wang, Germano J , Batley G, 2002, Porewater testing and analysis: the good, the bad, and the ugly, Marine Poll. Bull., Volume 44, Issue 5, 359–366

6) Chiou, C.T., and Kile, D.E., 2000, Contaminant sorption by soil and bed sediment--Is there a difference?: U.S. Geological Survey, Fact Sheet 087-00, 4 p.

7) Di Bonito M., 2005, Trace Elements in Soil Pore Water: A Comparison of Sampling Methods, Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, 299p

8) Hancock P.and Skinner B., 2000, Pore water chemistry, The Oxford Companion to the Earth, from Encyclopedia.com 15.May 2012, http:// www.encyclopedia.com
 USGS,2012, U.S. Geological Survey mājas lapa,

9) ITRC 2011,Technical/Regulatory Guidance ''Incorporating Bioavailability Considerations into the Evaluation of Contaminated Sediment Site'' , Prepared by The Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council Contaminated Sediments Team, 155.p

10) Osterkamp, W.R., 2008, Annotated definitions of selected geomorphic terms and related terms of hydrology, sedimentology, soil science and ecology: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1217, 49 p.

11) Reddy, R.N.2010, Soil Ehgeneering Testing Design and Remeditation, Dehli, IND Global Media, p.30

12) Seeberg-Elverfeldt J., Schlüter M., Feseker T, KöllingM., 2005, . Rhizon sampling of porewaters near the sediment-water interface of aquatic systems, Tthe American Society of Limnology and Oceanography Inc.: Limnol. Oceanogr.: Methods 3, 361–371

13) SETAC  , 2001, ‘’Technical Workshop Porewater Toxicity Testing: Biological, Chemical, and Ecological Considerations with a Review of Methods and Applications, and Recommendations for Future Areas of Research'', Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry , 23 p.

14) SESD Operating Procedure. 2007 Pore Water Sampling_AF.R0.doc, 2-16

15) U.S. Geological Survey, 2006, Appendix A--Codes used in water-quality processing system, in User's manual for the National Water Information System of the U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, Virginia, Open-File Report, 381 p.

16) USEPA, 2001, Technical manual:’’Collection of interstitial water, in Methods for collection, storage and manipulation of sediments for chemical and toxicological analyses-- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (EPA) Washington, D.C., Office of Science and Technology, 208 p

17) USEPA, 2006, "Water Quality Standards Review and Revision." United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Washington, DC http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/standards/rev.cfm)

18) V. Filipenkovs, M. Tūna, J.Grabis, Lekciju kurss ĢEOTEHNIKAS PAMATKURSS, RTU, 2006,10 lpp

19)Winger P.V and Lasier P.J. 1993. Sediment toxicity testing: Comparision of methods and evaluation of influencing factors, In J.W Gorsuch e.a., Eds Environmental Toxicity and Risk Assessment:2-nd Vol., American Sciety for testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, STP 1216, p.640-662

20)Winger P.V, Lasier P.J. 1997. Sediment and pore -water evaluations: capabilities and interests, Proceedings of tje U.S.Geological Survey (USGS) Sediment workshop, February 4-7, 5p.,

Uz lapas augšu
Uz sākumu

Zeidaks Jānis 20.01.2013